Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
R
RIOT
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
cm-projects
RIOT
Commits
f2194a8e
Commit
f2194a8e
authored
6 years ago
by
Alexandre Abadie
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
core/irq: fix 2 missing words in documentation
parent
201cff0a
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
core/include/irq.h
+2
-2
2 additions, 2 deletions
core/include/irq.h
with
2 additions
and
2 deletions
core/include/irq.h
+
2
−
2
View file @
f2194a8e
...
...
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
/**
* @brief This function sets the IRQ disable bit in the status register
*
* @return Previous value of status register. The return value should not
* @return Previous value of status register. The return value should not
be
* interpreted as a boolean value. The actual value is only
* significant for irq_restore().
*
...
...
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ unsigned irq_disable(void);
/**
* @brief This function clears the IRQ disable bit in the status register
*
* @return Previous value of status register. The return value should not
* @return Previous value of status register. The return value should not
be
* interpreted as a boolean value. The actual value is only
* significant for irq_restore().
*
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment