This patch causes incorrect usage of percpu<>/PERCPU() to cause
compilation errors instead of silent runtime corruptions.

Thanks to Dmitry for first noticing this issue in xen_intr.cc (see his
separate patch), and to Avi for suggesting a compile-time fix.

With this patch:

1. Using percpu<...> to *define* a per-cpu variable fails compilation.
   Instead, PERCPU(...) must be used for the definition, which is important
   because it places the variable in the ".percpu" section.

2. If a *declaration* is needed additionally (e.g., for a static class
   member), percpu<...> must be used, not PERCPU().
   Trying to use PERCPU() for declaration will cause a compilation error.

3. PERCPU() only works on statically-constructed objects - global variables,
   static function-variables and static class-members. Trying to use it
   on a dynamically-constructed object - stack variable, class field,
   or operator new - will cause a compilation error.

With this patch, the bug in xen_intr.cc would have been caught at
compile time.

Signed-off-by: Nadav Har'El <nyh@cloudius-systems.com>
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cloudius-systems.com>